Legal Opinion
Rhinehart v. Montgomery
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 19, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00678Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JOSEPH RHINEHART, Case No.: 22-CV-678 JLS (MMP) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S 14 OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND 15 W.L. MONTGOMERY, et al., RECOMMENDATION; 16 Defendants. (2) ADOPTING REPORT AND 17 RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING THE COURT 18 GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 19 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND 20 (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 21 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 22 23 (ECF Nos. 57, 68, 72–73, 75, 78–79) 24 25 Presently before the Court is Defendants M. Arvizu and J. Rodriguez (collectively, 26…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.