Legal Opinion

Applied Biosystems, Div. of Applera v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 28, 2010No. Slip Op. 10-72; Court 03-00251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge:

I

INTRODUCTION

This action involves classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) of certain thermal cyclers and thermal cycler parts. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) classified these goods under HTSUS Heading 8419, which includes “machinery, plant or laboratory equipment ... for the treatment of materials by a process involving a change of temperature” as well as “parts thereof.” Plaintiff Applied Biosystems (A Division of Applera Corporation) (“Plaintiff’) argues that these goods should instead be classified under HTSUS…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Applikon Biotechnology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  2. Belimo Automation A.G. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API