Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1946No. 4809PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANFORD, Chief Justice.
An action was brought in the superior court by the appellee, hereinafter called the plaintiff, against the appellant, hereinafter called the defendant, to have the court declare defendant’s Ordinance No. 2559 unconstitutional and to refund plaintiff the sums collected by defendant under its ordinance.
That part of the ordinance under which the fees were collected is as follows:
“Section 4014. Fees: — The following license fees shall be paid by the owner, or lessee, or operator, and whether the ownership or operating interest is general or special, to-wit:
“For each auto…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Horwith v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Smith v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Union Transportes De Nogales v. City of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979