Legal Opinion
Aldridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 28, 1999No. Civil H-90-140PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Senior District Judge.
In this consolidated case, this Court has once again been called upon to address the viability of claims asserted against the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) by former employees or survivors of employees of Kelly-Springfield Tire Company (“Kelly-Springfield”). 1 Like other plaintiffs in earlier suits filed against Goodyear in this Court, the plaintiffs in these sixty-six consolidated cases 2 have alleged that they are entitled to compensation from Goodyear under various tort theories for occupational diseases contracted by them during…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Aldridge, Sr. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Aldridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Aldridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000