Cresca Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Merchandise invoiced as “grenadine flavored sirup, cresca,” was classified by the collector as a nonenumerated manufactured article and was therefore assessed for duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1459 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:
1459. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid * * * on all articles manufactured in whole or in part, not specially provided for, a duty of 20 per centum ad valorem.
The importer protested that the importation was a sugar sirup, not specially provided for, testing above 48 per centum total sugars, and therefore…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Midwest Waste Material Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Olavarria & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- John Sexton & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.