Olavarria & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Eicwall, Judge:
In this case plaintiff is protesting the action of the collector of customs at the port of Tampa, Fla., in assessing duty upon *198a quantity of what plaintiff claims to be sugar sirup imported from Cuba. Twenty-seven entries are involved, filed at the ports of Miami and West Palm Beach during a period from August 4, 1943, to August 1, 1944. Five protests were consolidated for trial. The merchandise was classified as sugar dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the supplemental trade agreement with Cuba (T. D. 50541), by virtue of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heemsoth Kerner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Marianao Sugar Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Schieffelin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- United States v. Olavarria & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949