United States v. $100,348.00 U.S. Currency
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CLAIMANT’S MOTIONS FOR (1) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE FOR FORFEITURE; ■ (2) REMISSION/DENIAL OF ANY FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO THE 8TH AMENDMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY
LEW, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This case arises out of Claimant Eytan Mayzel’s (“Claimant”) violation of the currency reporting laws upon his departure from the United States. United States Customs officers seized Defendant $100,348.00 United States Currency (“defendant currency”)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. $80,180.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- United States v. Six Negotiable Checks in Various Denominations Totaling One Hundred Ninety One Thousand Six Hundred Seventy One Dollars and Sixty Nine Cents ($191,671.69)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- United States v. 2001 Honda Accord EX VIN 1HGCG22561A035829District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- United States v. $100,348.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.