Legal Opinion

United States v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2004No. Nos. 02-55330, 02-55363 and 02-55364PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, J., authored the opinion of the Court as to Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VII and VIII in which D.W. NELSON, J., and FISHER, J., join. FISHER, J., authored the opinion of the Court as to Part VI, in which D.W. NELSON, J., joins. WARDLAW, J., filed a dissenting opinion as to Part VI.

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge,

with whom D.W. NELSON, J., and FISHER, J., Circuit Judges, join:

These consolidated appeals from the district court’s forfeiture order present the novel question whether the “lawful possessor” of seized currency who has Article III standing to contest the seizure in a civil forfeiture…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Real Property Located in El Dorado County at 6380 Little Canyon RoadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America, Eytan Mayzel, Claimant-Appellee v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency, United States of America, Eytan Mayzel, Claimant-Appellant v. $100,348.00 in U.S. Currency, United States of America, Eric Amiel, Claimant-Appellant v. $100,348.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API