Bristol & Sweet Co. v. Skapple
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Cavalier County; Kneeshaw, J. Action by the Bristol & Sweet Company against' Louis Skapple and John Montgomery. Verdict for Montgomery; and, from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFisk, J.
Action to recover the purchase price of certain harness sold to the copartnership of Skapple & Montgomery, located at Wales, N. D. The sale is admitted, and also the price; and the *272sole question on the trial was whether defendant John Montgomery was a member of said firm, and hence hable as a partner. It was the contention of the defense that there were two distinct firms at Wales doing business under the name of Skapple & Montgomery, one of which was engaged in the harness business and the other in the farm machinery business, respondent being a member only of the latter, while Skapple and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Madson v. RuttenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Gull River Lumber Co. v. Osbrone McMillan Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Fields v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
3Cited by11 opinions
- Killmer v. DuchschererNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Kohler v. StephensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Jasper v. FreitagNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Arneson v. NergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.