Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
This is an action for libel. Upon a former appeal (66 N. D. 578, 268 N. W. 400) involving a demurrer to the complaint, we held that the matter alleged to be defamatory did not constitute libel per se, but that the complaint did allege a libel per quod, and suffiicently set forth facts constituting a defamatory publication. We further held that general damages do not result as a matter of course from the publication of defamatory matter that is not libelous per se and that the complaint was demurrable for failure to allege special damages. We also held that the complaint was demurrable for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Rokusek v. National Union Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Oates v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Thompson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Rattie v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Westerso v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Vanover v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Moritz v. Medical Arts Clinic, P. C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Bertsch v. DuemelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Haser Ex Rel. Haser v. PapeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.