Legal Opinion

Gull River Lumber Co. v. Osbrone McMillan Elevator Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1896PublishedCited by 14 opinions

. Appeal from District Court, Ransom County; Lauder, J. Action by the Gull ■ River Lumber Company against the Osbrone McMillan Elevator Company. Verdict for plaintiff. From an order granting a new trial, it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, C. J.

This action is brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain wheat covered by a chattel mortgage owned by the plaintiff. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant, upon a statement of the case, moved for a new trial of the action upon several grounds, among which was the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict. The motion was granted, and, appended to its order granting a new trial, the learned trial 'court has set out a memorandum of the grounds or reasons upon which a new trial was ordered. After pointing out the fact that from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Braithwaite v. AikenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Patch v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kohlman v. HylandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Ross v. RobertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bristol & Sweet Co. v. SkappleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dinnie v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API