Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2005No. 20020338PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

¶ 1 Felipe Ruiz Santana retained attorney Geoffrey Clark to defend him against a murder charge. At the end of a four-day trial described by the trial court as an “adventure,” the jury convicted Santana as charged. The State thereafter asked the trial court to hold Clark in criminal contempt for his actions during the trial. Following an eviden-tiary hearing, the trial court granted the motion, sentencing Clark to thirty days in jail without work release or time off for good behavior. Clark appeals both the substance of the criminal contempt order and the sentence imposed. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wilson Supply, Inc. v. Fradan Manufacturing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Shipman v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United Park City Mines Co. v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain FondsUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Iota, LLC v. Davco Management Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. Macris v. Sevea International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. State v. Santana-RuizUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Traco Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Comtrol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API