Legal Opinion

State v. Stinson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 8, 1981PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, A. R. J.

Following trial de novo before a Cumberland County jury of the Superior Court, Robert Stinson, the defendant-appellant, was convicted of the offense of criminal mischief in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 806(1)(A) (Supp.1978) 1 in connection with the first count of a complaint alleging that Stinson did intentionally and knowingly damage the property of the Central Maine Power Company, to wit, the passenger door of one of its trucks, causing a value loss of $99.00. He appeals from the ensuing judgment. We affirm the judgment.

On June 21,1979, Howard Allen was driving a truck…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Fowlkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. State v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Matter of BenoitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API