Legal Opinion

Acuña-Atalaya v. Newmont Mining Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 11, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–1315PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gerald Austin McHugh, United States District Judge

This case arises out of a land dispute between indigenous subsistence farmers in Peru and the Peruvian subsidiary of a multi-national gold mining company headquartered in the United States. At the forefront is a rancorous struggle over the right to occupy the land in question, amid years-long litigation in Peruvian courts. Plaintiffs Máxima Acuña-Atalaya de Chaupe and her family complain of repeated invasions of their farm, alleging threats on their lives, assaults, and destruction of livestock and crops. They have brought this action in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Acuna-Atalaya v. Newmont Mining CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
  2. BEHRENS v. ARCONIC, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Maxima Acuna-Atalaya v. Newmont Mining CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. Maxima Acuna-Atalaya v. Newmont Mining CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API