Legal Opinion
BEHRENS v. ARCONIC, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 23, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02664Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KRISTEN BEHRENS, ESQ., as CIVIL ACTION Administratrix, et al. NO. 19-2664 v. ARCONIC, INC., et al. MEMORANDUM RE: Rule 59(e) MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 ORDER Baylson, J. November 23, 2020 I. Introduction Plaintiffs have filed a Motion under Rule 59(e) to alter or amend the Court’s September 16, 2020 Order, granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under the doctrine of forum non conveniens (“FNC”), with conditions and without prejudice. “A proper Rule 59(e) motion . . . must rely on one of three…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.