Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 21, 2010No. AC 31001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Daniel Santiago, appeals following the habeas court’s denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion when it denied his petition for certification to appeal and improperly rejected his claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. More specifically, the petitioner claims that trial counsel failed to present an alternative intoxication defense and to object to several alleged prosecutorial improprieties. We…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. BEWRY v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gooden v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Stepney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Koslik v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Sotomayor v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. State v. Ramon A. G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API