Legal Opinion

BEWRY v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 18, 2010No. AC 30505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The petitioner, Bernard Bewry, appeals following the habeas court’s denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. His claims on appeal— alleging ineffective assistance by his various previous counsel and that the court improperly found his claim of illegal seizure and violation of due process to be procedurally defaulted—center on his argument that his arraignment was untimely under General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 54-lg. Following our review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we conclude that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Santiago v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Lane v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. BEWRY v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API