Hamilton v. Prewett
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Paul Hamilton appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Morgan Prewett. Specifically, Hamilton claims that the trial court erred in granting Prewett’s motion for summary judgment because (1) Prewett failed to designate evidence to support his motion in accordance with Indiana Trial Rule 56(C); (2) the evidence that Prewett did reference in his motion did not demonstrate that Hamilton had failed to prove any element of the defamation per se claim; and (3) Indiana’s Strategic Lawsuit Against Public…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- New Times, Inc. v. IsaacksTexas Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Mink v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Filippo v. Lee Publications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007
- Melton v. OusleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Andrew Meyer v. Beta Tau House Corporation, Beta Tau of Sigma Pi, Sigma Pi Fraternity International, Inc., and Quentin CalderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Newman v. JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ASSN.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.