Sanders v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
Edward Wayne Sanders appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. He complains of a jury instruction on the parole law and a portion of the jury charge regarding the date of the offense. He also urges that he is entitled to a new trial because the State used its peremptory jury challenges to purposefully eliminate black persons from the jury. We find these contentions to be without merit and affirm the conviction.
Pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Proc. Ann. art. 37.07, § 4(a) (Vernon Supp.1987), the jury was instructed as follows:
Under the law applicable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Rose v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Joslin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Winton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988