Legal Opinion

Reed v. City of Union

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1995No. 67246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

The City of Union appeals from the trial court judgment holding the city’s voluntary annexation of the land of Harlen and Lucille Meyer into the city to be null and void. We affirm.

The Meyers own a tract of land in unincorporated Franklin County comprised of fifteen parcels. In November 1992 they requested the tract be annexed into the City of Union pursuant to § 71.012 RSMol986. The perimeter of the Meyer tract is approximately 8400 feet with 6.14 feet abutting the city limits of Union. Plaintiff, Dorothy Reed, owns two parcels of real estate in the vicinity. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Kingsport v. State Ex Rel. Crown Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Reynolds v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Martee v. City of KennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodson v. City of WentzvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Dodson v. City of WentzvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Curtis v. City of HillsboroMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API