Legal Opinion

City of Kingsport v. State Ex Rel. Crown Enterprises, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1978PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Chief Justice.

This is a suit in the nature of a quo warranto proceeding instituted pursuant to Sec. 6-310, T.C.A., to contest the validity of an annexation ordinance of the City of Kingsport. The trial judge invalidated the ordinance. We reverse.

I

The Annexed Territory

The annexation ordinance was duly and regularly passed by the governing body of the City of Kingsport, and all statutory procedural requirements have been met.

The ordinance provides for the annexation of 806 acres situated generally astride U. S. Highway 11W (Stone Drive) and lying generally west and southwest of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Town of Fond Du Lac v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Morton v. Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Witt v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Bastnagel v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Pirtle v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Highwoods Properties, Inc. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. Earhart v. City of BristolTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Collier v. City of Pigeon ForgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Martee v. City of KennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Moretz v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API