Legal Opinion

Hume, Trustee v. Brown Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 1091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by C. Ross Plume, trustee in bankruptcy oí M. J. Duncan, against the Brown Shoe Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Oklahoma county. C. Ross Hume, trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of M. J. Duncan, a bankrupt, began this action to1 recover of and from the Brown Shoe Company, the defendant, the value of certain property conveyed to it, contrary to the provisions of sections 60a and 60b of the national bankruptcy act of 1898 (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 St. at L. 562 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3445]), as amended by the act of 1903 (Act Feb. 5, 1903, c. 487, sec. 73, 32 St. at L. 799 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 1506]). The adjudication of Duncan a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coder v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Walbrun v. BabbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. McElvain v. HardestyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Huttig Mfg. Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Hardy v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Sharum v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API