Legal Opinion

Huttig Mfg. Co. v. Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1908No. Nos. 2,565, 2,570PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa.

1Opinion of the Court

HOOK, Circuit Judge.-

The principal question on these appeals is whether the Huttig Manufacturing Company received a voidable preference when it took a mortgage on all of the property of D. Winter, bankrupt. As the mortgage was taken within the prohibited period of four months we proceed to inquire whether Winter was then insolvent, and if so, whether the manufacturing company or its agents acting therein had reasonable cause to believe a preference was intended. The trustee says he was insolvent because, first, he was a member of the firm of E. D. Winter & Co., also adjudged bankrupt, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swarts v. SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Coder v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Michaels v. PostSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Kobusch v. HandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bergquist v. First National Bank of St. Paul (In Re American Lumber Co.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
  2. Stern v. PaperDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1910
  3. Rodgers v. Bankers National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Paper v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  5. In Re Consupak, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API