Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Kuhn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The court below, after hearing the evidence, directed a verdict for defendant, and the general question is whether the plaintiff is entitled to complain of this ruling.

Margaret Hack otherwise called Margaret Taufkirch died in March, 1870, and the plaintiff was appointed administrator in August, 1880. As shown by his testimony the plaintiff’s case presents in substance the following state of facts.

*515In 1863 decedent placed $1276 in defendant’s hands and received his note therefor; that she drew the amount down to $910; that in the summer of 1868 she fell into a state of dementia bordering on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. BurnsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Church v. GilmanNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Gould v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Tompkins v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Latham v. UdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CulverIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Bunn v. PostellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Neelen v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Rollet v. HeimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API