Legal Opinion

Miller v. Wall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 16, 1926No. 8 Div. 868, 868-APublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The case is tried upon an agreed statement of fact, with all the parties at interest before the court. The words “and owned,” after the words “to be held,” in the second paragraph of the will, are stricken by the amended pleading of the guardian of Lizzie Louise Watkins, a non compos mentis. The exhibits to the agreed statement of fact contain said words. However, this variance between the pleading and proof is immaterial. It is necessary that a sale of the properties be ordered to discharge the contract and receivership liens and to effectuate a division among joint owners.

It is the opinion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Austin v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Phillips v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sutton v. LeibSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Whitehead v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Braley v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API