Phillips v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The hill was for .sale for' partition of lands among joint owners. The effect of the recent amendment of the statutes was discussed in Wood v. Barnett, 94 So. 338, 208 Ala. 295; Sandlin v. Anders, 98 So. 299, 210 Ala. 396; Stokes v. Stokes, (Ala. Sup.) 101 So. 885; Chandler v. Home Loan Co., 99 So. 723, 211 Ala. 80; Clark v. Whitfield (Ala. Sup.) 105 So. 200. And the right of a cotenant to rents was the subject of O’Connor v. Brinsfield, 101 So. 679, 212 Ala. 68; Porter v. Henderson, 86 So. 531, 204 Ala. 564; Winsett v. Winsett, 83 So. 117; 203 Ala. 373.
To maintain a bill in equity for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miller v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- McGuire v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whitehead v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Fundaburk v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Miller v. WallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Turner v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.