Legal Opinion

Verrill v. School City of Hobart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1944No. 27,904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fansler, C. J.:

The appellant began this action. The complaint alleges that the appellant is the owner of certain real estate in the City of Hobart; that the School City of Hobart is the owner of certain described adjoining real estate; that he and his grantors have, and have had for more than twenty years last past, an easement or right of way over the school city’s property; that he and his grantors have continuously for more than twenty years used this right of way as a passageway or driveway, and that “he has thereby acquired an easement in said strip of land.” It is further alleged that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freel v. School City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Morgan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ehle v. State ex rel. WisslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Randall v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sims v. Town of New ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Cracchiolo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Sloat v. TurnerNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Cross-Road Farms, LLC v. Peggy WhitlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API