Legal Opinion

Cracchiolo v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 29, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

The appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Cracchiolo, brought an action in inverse eminent domain to recover damages to their property for loss of access resulting from construction of a controlled access highway in the City of Tucson, Arizona. The cause was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, solely on the issue of liability and this appeal is from a judgment against the Cracchiolos and from the court’s order denying their motion for a new trial.

In 1948 the Arizona State Highway Commission adopted a resolution calling for the construction of the Tucson Controlled Access…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kerby v. State Ex Rel. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Drane v. AveryArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Edwards v. SheetsArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Burgett v. CalentineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Busby v. State Ex Rel. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trigg v. AllemandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Pretzer v. LassenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API