Legal Opinion

Turney v. Barr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 9, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Court. — Hon. James D. Gieeen, Judge. Habeas corpus. The plaintiff was remanded to the custody of the defendant, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Seevers, C.

J. — The petition states that the defendant is warden of the penitentiary at Anamosa, and, as such, has custody of the plaintiff, who is restrained of his liberty, and that the cause and pretense of such restraint is certain judgments, rendered by the district court of Jackson county in certain criminal actions wherein the state of Iowa was plaintiff and the appellant was defendant, copies of which said judgments are made a part of the petition. The following is a copy of the proceedings of the court, and of one of said judgments, as the same appears of record:

“State of Iowa,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PolsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Ex parte HolmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  3. Zelle v. McHenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. State v. FooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Skipper v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Ex Parte PlaistridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Ex parte MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Elsner v. ShrigleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API