Legal Opinion

Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co. v. Holmes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1926No. 4943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit for infringement of letters patent No. I, 074,592, issued September 30,1913, to' Robert H. Anderson, assignor to Ruth B. Anderson, for a wall bed. The plaintiffs in the suit were the patentee, the purchaser of the patent under an executory contract of sale, and a licensee of the purchaser under the ex-ecutory contract. The defendant in the action was a former licensee of the patentee. Upon final hearing the court below found that *951claims one and three of the patent had been infringed and entered a decree accordingly. From that decree, the defendant has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co. v. Murphy Wall Bed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  3. Marshall & Stearns Co. v. Murphy Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dongguan Zhouda Technology Co Ltd v. DaiDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API