Legal Opinion
Osbakken v. Venable
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1991No. Nos. 89-8076, 89-8078PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Robert Osbakken’s amended complaint includes claims for fraud, constructive fraud, forgery, conversion, breach of contract, negligence, gross negligence, and civil RICO against defendants-appellees William Venable, Max C. Robinson, and Star Valley State Bank. The claims arise from the alleged misdirection of the proceeds of a loan from the Star Valley State Bank, where Robinson was Chief Operating Officer, to the Osbakken-Venable partnership. Osbakken seeks recovery of $235,900 in actual damages, $600,000 in consequential damages, and $10,000,000 in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- V. Ray Summers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Franklin v. Oklahoma City Abstract & Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Cheek v. FNF Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Osbakken v. VenableCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- TRI-STATE INS. CO. OF MINN. v. BontjesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Nieves v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.