Cheek v. FNF Construction, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants Dennis and Misty Cheek challenge the summary judgment granted by the district court in favor of respondent, FNF Construction, Inc. (hereafter FNF). The Cheeks contend that the district court erred in entertaining FNF’s motion for summary judgment because they were not afforded adequate notice or service of notice. We agree and vacate the order.
FACTS
On Sunday, March 25, 1990, at 9:45 p.m., the Cheeks’ vehicle struck a cow owned by Cliven Bundy on northbound 1-15 just south of Mesquite, Nevada. About five miles south of the scene, FNF was in the process of paving a portion of…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Development Corporation v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Helen C. Kistner v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary, Dept. Of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Robert Winfrey and Glenn McGhee v. Lou Brewer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Soebbing v. Carpet Barn, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Osbakken v. VenableCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Bronneke v. RutherfordNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Quinlan v. CAMDEN USA, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Copper Sands Homeowners v. Flamingo 94Nevada Supreme Court · 2014