Legal Opinion

Wickstrom v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1934No. Civ. No. 9549PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The petitioner while employed as a carpenter’s helper was working on a scaffold attached to a high building. The scaffolding gave way and the peti-. tioner fell eight stories. By reason of the fall he suffered *137numerous injuries but he made a substantial recovery. Within the time allowed by law and in a proper manner he applied to the defendant commission for an adjustment of his claim for disability benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Insurance and Safety Act. The facts of employment, wages, age of employee, and injury arising out of and occurring in the course of his employment, are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Newton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Limited Mutual Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API