Rosman v. Travelers' Insurance Co. of Connecticut
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Dueey, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Oourt.
1Opinion of the CourtConstable, J.
The appellant was the beneficiary named in a policy of accident insurance issued by the appellee to Samuel Rosman, her husband. In the suit by her to recover the amount for which Rosman was insured, in case of death, the jury found a verdict in favor of the appellee, and from the judgment entered this appeal was taken.
The record contains eighty-four exceptions to the rulings of the lower Court, and although each has been considered by us, it is- not practical to discuss them separately and in detail, but they will be dealt with in the classes in which they naturally arrange themselves, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knights of Maccabees of the World v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Life Ass'n v. WinnTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Whitford v. North State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Callies v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Brown v. Mystic Workers of the WorldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- PaineWebber Inc. v. EastCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KuhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Stiegler v. Eureka Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Quist v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.