Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Dudley

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 1, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The stipulated facts relating to the question of interpretation herein propounded, in so far as the court deems them pertinent to a decision, are as follows: The testator at the time of the execution of the will was a practicing lawyer, maintaining offices for that purpose both in the boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn in the city of New York. He was, at that time, unmarried, and of the age of approximately sixty years. The will was drawn by him in his own hand and executed at his Brooklyn law office. His nearest blood relatives were his sister, Charlotte, his nieces, Frances and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Overheiser v. . LackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Mitchell v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. In re the Estate of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. Flynn v. . McDermottNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. In re the Estate of SoyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. In re the Estate of LevyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of KoorbuschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  4. In re the Accounting of BaurNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  5. In re the Estate of HookerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API