Legal Opinion
In re the Construction of the Will of Koorbusch
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 9, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rubenstein, S.
Construction is sought of testatrix’ will where-under she gave, devised and bequeathed to her husband all of her property ‘ ‘ with full power to dispose of same as he might see fit.” A parcel of realty so devised remained undisposed of upon the husband’s death.
The will then provided “ On his death to my living four children ” naming them, “ share and share alike, with the one exception that my daughter, Margaret, shall receive an additional amount of $500.” Following that sentence, is the provision “ In the event of the death of any of the above mentioned four children, then it…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vincent v. RixNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re the Estate of SoyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of NeydorffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- In re National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re the Estate of EvansNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Construction of the Will of MooreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- In re the Estate of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
- In Re Estate of WagnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- In re the Estate of AndrewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of HowesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.