United States v. Baum
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Timothy Baum appeals following his guilty plea to possession of child pornography. His counsel moves for leave to withdraw in a brief filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Baum filed a pro se response to the Anders brief raising several issues. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
I
A search of Baum’s home led to the seizure of a laptop computer and other storage media containing hundreds of images…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Utah Lighthouse Ministry v. Foundation for Apologetic Information & ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. CassiusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Ramirez-NegronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Michael ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.