Legal Opinion
Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 23, 2006No. SC 17463PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiffs, Nicole Hurley (Nicole), who was permanently brain damaged by a cardiac event allegedly caused by a downward adjustment to the rate of her pacemaker, and her parents, Lucinda Hurley and Navarro Hurley, brought the underlying action against the defendant Medtronic, Inc. (defendant), maker of the pacemaker, pursuant to the Connecticut Product Liability Act, General Statutes § 52-572m et seq., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., claiming, inter alia, that one of the defendant’s representatives had made…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hansen v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Glover v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Batoh v. McNeil-PPC, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.