Legal Opinion

Vertigo Media, Inc. v. Earbuds Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 14, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00120Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VERTIGO MEDIA, INC. AND REMOTE ) MEDIA LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No. 21-120 (MN) v. ) ) EARBUDS INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER At Wilmington this 14th day of October 2021: On January 29, 2021, Plaintiffs Vertigo Media, Inc. (“Vertigo”) and Remote Media LLC (“Remote”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued Defendant Earbuds Inc. (“Defendant”) for infringement of claims 21, 26-28, and 31-32 of

U.S. Patent No. 9,549,024

(“the ’024 Patent”), claims 1-4 and 6-7 of

U.S. Patent No. 10,198,777

(“the ’777 Patent”), and claims 14 and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API