Legal Opinion

State v. De Gress

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1888No. 6735PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Townes.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

This proceeding was commenced in the court below by an information in the nature of a quo warranto filed by the district attorney of the Twenty-sixth Judicial District upon relation of C. E. Fisher, for the purpose of determining whether or not the respondent, who is appellee here, is qualified to hold the office of alderman in the city of Austin.

The judge below, to whom the case was submitted without a jury, entertained jurisdiction of the cause, but held that under the facts in evidence the respondent was not disqualified to hold the office.

It was alleged in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. State ex rel. Jennett v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Williamson v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. State v. De GressTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In Re ThomaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brown v. WheelockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Orndorff v. State Ex Rel. McGillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Little v. State ex rel. ParsellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API