Legal Opinion

Little v. State ex rel. Parsell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1890No. 2920PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Lijiscomb. Tried below before Hon. Frank Willis. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

This is a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto instituted by the Attorney-General and the district attorney of the Thirty-first Judicial District of the State, at the instance of A. A. Parsell, against appellant, to try the title to the office of county judge of Roberts County. The case was brought in the District Court of that county, but was subsequently transferred to Lipscomb.

The original information was not supported by a sworn relation, nor were its allegations directly sworn to. It was, however, filed by order of the district judge. Before the trial a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. De GressTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Tex. & Pac. R'y Co. v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. City of East Dallas v. State ex rel. PutzTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Duncan v. WillisTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In Re Candidacy of DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Masquelette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Cramer v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API