Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Oldsmobile Division of General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1973No. 5 May Term 1973, Docket No. 54,322PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Plaintiff underwent a surgical bilateral cataract extraction at the age of ten. Thereafter plaintiff could only differentiate between light and dark and detect some movement. However, with the aid of glasses and contact lenses his vision could be corrected to a 20/25 vision in each eye. Despite this handicap plaintiff worked for defendant from 1947 to 1964.

On November 17, 1964, plaintiff received an injury within the course of his employment resulting in the loss of industrial use of his left leg.

On August 20, 1969, the referee decided that plaintiff had lost his eyes within the meaning of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Verberg v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lindsay v. Glennie Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Weaver v. Maxwell Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Whitt v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pleiness v. Mueller Brass Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Komendera v. American Bar & Cabinet ManufacturersMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Nulf v. Browne-Morse CoMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API