Legal Opinion

Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1983No. 67047, (Calendar No. 12)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

This case involves the question whether a worker with a pre-existing vision disability who suffers the specific loss of a hand is entitled to total and permanent disability benefits.

We affirm the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board that he is not.

On September 7, 1962, Edward Hakala lost his right hand in a press accident while working at Burroughs Corporation. Burroughs voluntarily paid specific loss benefits for the injury.

On June 17, 1968, Mr. Hakala filed a petition claiming that he was totally and permanently disabled and asking for benefits from the Second Injury Fund.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. Glennie Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hilton v. Oldsmobile Division of General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Nulf v. Browne-Morse CoMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hakala v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Creative Dimensions Group, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  2. Tew v. Hillsdale Tool & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Cain v. Waste Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. O'CONNOR v. Binney Auto PartsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Cain v. Waste Management, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API