Legal Opinion
Clark-Rice Corp. v. Waltham Bleachery & Dye Works
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 31, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
These are cross actions of contract, tried together, arising out of alleged breaches of an agreement *406executed in New York on January 1,1926. It provided that the Clark-Rice Corporation, organized under the laws of that State and hereinafter called the Corporation, was to act as sole representative or soliciting agent for The Waltham Bleachery and Dye Works, a Massachusetts corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Bleachery, for the purpose of soliciting for it the bleaching, dyeing and finishing of cotton piece goods from all its existing converter customers, of soliciting new accounts for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Hall v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Squire v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Zarthar v. SalibaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Rayden Engineering Corp. v. ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Gishen v. Dura Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.