Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Insul-Mastic Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided June 23, 1955No. 2702Published

1Opinion of the Court

McNaugher, P. J.,

We are to dispose of defendant’s preliminary objections to plaintiffs’ complaint as amended.

The amended complaint alleges that defendant, a Delaware corporation, whose principal place of business is in Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, is engaged in the sale of mastic coatings, that these are produced, *65under patents owned by one Orville B. McGrew, by Insul-Mastic Laboratories, Inc., an Illinois corporation, of which McGrew is the president and majority stockholder, that under an agreement with McGrew defendant was given the exclusive right to sell the coatings throughout the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Madden v. Penn Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Cunliffe v. Consumers Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Machen v. Machen & Mayer Electrical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API