Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Vincent

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1978No. 7828DC9PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Plaintiff first contends that the Alabama court was not entitled to modify the prior North Carolina alimony decree. G.S. 50-ll(d) provides that a sister state cannot terminate alimony payments awarded under a North Carolina decree when the supporting spouse obtains an ex parte divorce in that state. See, e.g., Fleek v. Fleek, 270 N.C. 736, 155 S.E. 2d 290 (1967).

In the case sub judice, however, the Alabama courts had in personam jurisdiction over the plaintiff-wife since she answered the complaint, counterclaimed and entered a general appearance in the Alabama proceeding. There…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Lopez v. AverySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Thomas v. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Isserman v. IssermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. Goodman v. GoodmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glickman v. MesighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API