Legal Opinion
Glickman v. Mesigh
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 5, 1980No. 80SA106PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn
The respondent-appellant, Charles Duane Mesigh, brings this appeal from an order of the district court modifying a child support provision in a California decree of dissolution. The action in the district court was commenced by the petitioner-appellee, Sharon Kay Glickman, under section 14-11-101, C.R.S. 1973 (1979 Supp.). We affirm the judgment.
Sharon Kay Glickman (petitioner) and Charles Duane Mesigh (respondent) were divorced on June 8, 1971, pursuant to an interlocutory decree of dissolution entered by the superior court of Santa Clara County, State of California. A final decree of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Woodhouse v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Nguyen v. Swedish Medical CenterColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Formanack v. FormanackNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Osteoimplant Technology, Inc. v. Rathe Productions, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- In re C.G.G.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.