Legal Opinion

Few v. Few

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 16, 1961No. 17852PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Joseph A. Few, the respondent herein, did, on September 23, 1960, institute this action against Benjamin F. Few, the appellant herein. The complaint sets out two causes of action. The first cause of action is for damages in the sum of Ten Thousand & 00/100 ($10,000.00) Dollars for the alleged breach of an agreement arising out of the division of the property of the estate of I. P. Few. It appears that the respondent and appellant are sons of the late I. P. New and beneficiaries under his last will and testament. This appeal is not concerned with the first cause of action.

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Gordon v. RothbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Vaughan v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Price v. Middleton & RavenelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  5. Coulbourn v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Redwend Ltd. Partnership v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Kuznik v. Bees Ferry AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Anthony v. Padmar, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Warren v. Dill (In re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API