Legal Opinion

Fertig v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 18, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGentjng, J.

This action is for legal expenses allegedly incurred by the plaintiff in the defense of a negligence action against him. The plaintiff asserts that he is an additional assured under a so-called omnibus clause in an automobile liability policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff’s employer. The answer is a general denial with a separate and distinct defense which alleges that the policy was issued subject to an indorsement known as an employers’ non-ownership liability indorsement and that by virtue of the terms of this indorsement, as read with the terms of the policy, coverage is not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Didlake v. Standard Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. Holthe v. IskowitzWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kohly v. Royal Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Linenschmidt v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Hamm v. CamerotaWashington Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API