Fertig v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtGentjng, J.
This action is for legal expenses allegedly incurred by the plaintiff in the defense of a negligence action against him. The plaintiff asserts that he is an additional assured under a so-called omnibus clause in an automobile liability policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff’s employer. The answer is a general denial with a separate and distinct defense which alleges that the policy was issued subject to an indorsement known as an employers’ non-ownership liability indorsement and that by virtue of the terms of this indorsement, as read with the terms of the policy, coverage is not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Didlake v. Standard Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Holthe v. IskowitzWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Kohly v. Royal Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Linenschmidt v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Hamm v. CamerotaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.