Legal Opinion

Lenetska v. Goldstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotein, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice. The motion is opposed on the ground that the defendant has waived any right to question the service of the summons by virtue of the fact that he previously moved for an order for the bringing in of additional defendants. That motion was denied without prejudice. Examination of the. filed papers reveals that the motion was one to compel plaintiffs to bring in other defendants.

In Farmer v. National Life Association, (138 N. Y. 265) it was held that a defendant, by initiating a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Farmer v. National Life Ass'n of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Jaworower v. RovereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Jaworower v. RovereNew York Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Revona Realty Corp. v. WassermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Hayuk v. HallookNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API